CASE FILE #292·THE NOVEMBER 2026 BALLOT·
collecting drafting submitted
The November 2026 Ballot

San Diego Unified M — Repair, Student Safety, No Tax Rate Increase

AI Fact Sheet
As of 2026-10-05 · November 3 election · AI draft · geography: San Diego (4).
Built on public records
Documented fact — traces to a filed public record.
Inference — a reading of the record, not a legal finding.

What a YES vote does

YES lets San Diego Unified borrow $3.5 billion for school buildings and staff housing, repaid with property taxes.

Official vote explanation, signed district resolution and tax statement, 2026-07-14; retrieved 2026-10-05; scanned pages visually verified.

What a NO vote does

NO rejects this new $3.5 billion bond; earlier school bonds and their taxes continue.

Official vote explanation, signed district resolution and tax statement, 2026-07-14; retrieved 2026-10-05; scanned pages visually verified.

Cost and money

The signed district tax statement estimates $8.1 billion in total principal and interest if all bonds are sold.

The average annual tax is estimated at $32 per $100,000 of assessed value, with a peak of $59.18 in 2036–37 and final collection in 2062–63. The ballot question estimates $204 million annually while bonds are outstanding. These are projections, not binding tax guarantees; assessed value is not market value.

Official fiscal analysis, signed district resolution and tax statement, 2026-07-14; retrieved 2026-10-05; scanned pages visually verified.

Who put it on the ballot

San Diego Unified Board of Education adopted the resolution July 14, 2026, by 5–0; Registrar received it July 16.

Only district voters vote on M; approval requires 55%.

Registrar signed resolution, page 8, 2026-07-14. Richard Barrera is linked as district board president, as named on the official current board page, undated, retrieved 2026-10-05. Captured resolution.

A rule that matters

Bond funds cover capital facilities, including workforce housing; they cannot pay teacher or administrator salaries or ordinary operating expenses.

Annual independent financial and performance audits and a citizens’ oversight committee are required. The resolution plans issuance so M plus Measure YY stays within YY’s 2025–26 maximum rate at issuance; the old Proposition S combined-rate limit does not apply to M. The tax statement warns rates may vary and are additional to other bond taxes. Keeping a combined rate steady can still extend how long taxpayers pay.

Official analysis and law, signed district resolution and tax statement, 2026-07-14; retrieved 2026-10-05; scanned pages visually verified.

Who is paying

Yes: San Diegans for Quality Schools, Yes on M — filer 1484127

$598,572.20 reported for 2026 through captured filings: Form 460 year-to-date $419,572.20 through September 19, plus $179,000.00 in later Form 497 receipts. County official filing search, retrieved 2026-10-05. County sources use the local portal rather than Cal-Access.

The committee also raised about $100,000 in 2025, led by DLR Group ($30,000, INC10, Nov. 6, 2025). Captured 2025 receipts, filed February 2, 2026. The 2026 total and table below exclude that earlier money.

Scroll horizontally to see all columns.

Top 2026 fundersCaptured amountFiling identifier, dates and transaction IDsInterest / existing DB
Building a Stronger West, Sponsored by Western States Regional Council of Carpenters$125,000.00INC232 (2026-10-01; filed 10/2/2026 6:12:26 PM)Filer identity as reported; further economic interests unverified. No exact DB identity verified; near matches not adopted
Laborers International Union of North America Local 89 PAC Fund$50,000.00INC217 (2026-09-18; filed 9/24/2026 11:00:48 PM)Filer identity as reported; further economic interests unverified. No exact DB identity verified; near matches not adopted
Harris & Associates$28,003.98INC104 (2026-06-15; filed 7/31/2026 8:37:29 PM); NON103 (2026-05-27; filed 7/31/2026 8:37:29 PM)Filer identity as reported; further economic interests unverified. DB organization #1729 — lookup record
Aecom Technology Corporation$25,000.00INC63 (2026-03-17; filed 7/27/2026 10:01:38 PM)Filer identity as reported; further economic interests unverified. No exact DB identity verified; near matches not adopted
Gafcon PM-CM LLC(Bryan Benso)$25,000.00INC127 (2026-07-08; filed 9/24/2026 11:00:48 PM)Filer identity as reported; further economic interests unverified. No exact DB identity verified; near matches not adopted

The September 24 Form 460 summary, page 2, reports $419,572.20 for 2026 through September 19, including $7,972.20 nonmonetary support and no loans. The captured itemized periodic receipts are $50 lower because the summary includes $50 unitemized monetary receipts. Later Form 497 receipts add $179,000, including the Carpenters-sponsored committee’s $125,000 October 1 receipt, filed October 2. The amended September 23 late report supersedes its original; pre-September 20 late notices are not added again. Top five use monetary plus nonmonetary receipts; Harris’s $28,003.98 includes $3,003.98 nonmonetary support. Four funders tie at $25,000: AECOM, Gafcon PM-CM, Erickson Hall Construction (INC149, August 11) and the San Diego County Building Trades Council Family Housing Corporation / National City Park Apartments and affiliated entities (INC195, September 9). The last two were filed September 24 in the same periodic export. The table selects two of that four-way tie; no unique fifth place exists.

The local portal exposes Form/type, period, filing date and transaction IDs, but a durable global filing-number URL was not exposed. These identifiers and saved exports locate each record; no global filing number was invented. Session PDF URLs expire.

No: finance unknown

No dedicated current opposition committee, total raised or top-five ranking was verified. County searches for Measure M, San Diego Unified, Quality Schools and likely opposition names are captured in sources/. Possible opposition committee names were checked separately; names and unrelated receipts were not assigned to this election. County search, retrieved 2026-10-05. The current Yes campaign identifies its committee as filer 1484127; its “READ Ballot Argument” link actually returned a Taxpayers Association press release, so it was not treated as a ballot argument.

Why: who benefits

Students and school communities receive capital improvements; district teachers and staff can benefit from workforce housing.

Charter-school facilities receive an allocation tied to the district’s projected 16.2% charter enrollment in 2026–27. Construction, design and financing providers may benefit from funded work. Campaign contributions establish financial support, not a promised contract or improper award. The two largest captured funders identify Carpenters and Laborers sponsors. Gafcon PM-CM’s own leadership page identifies Bryan Benso as CEO and its work as public capital projects; AECOM’s own site lists construction management, design and engineering services. Harris & Associates’ service page describes education construction management. These businesses have interests in the kind of capital work M funds; no current M contract award was verified.

Official law and analysis, signed district resolution and tax statement, 2026-07-14; retrieved 2026-10-05; scanned pages visually verified; committee/interest declarations and dated receipts above.

Funder business sources: Gafcon leadership, Harris education/construction-management services, and AECOM services, each undated, retrieved 2026-10-05. These describe services and business interests; they do not establish a contract award. Harris has an exact-name DB organization row #1729, but it is typed “trade_association,” inconsistent with the company service description; the identity/type needs review. SDUSD organization #8540 is likewise typed “corporation.” These existing labels were preserved, not silently repaired. SDUSD lookup.

Existing database, checked 2026-10-05: San Diego Unified School District organization #8540; Richard Barrera politician #71 (district board official). Funder rows above link the recorded find and resolve results, including exact entity IDs. Near matches were not merged; profiles and prior evidence are leads, not proof about this measure. Lookup custody.

Our view — opinion

What remains unknown

Money received after the captured filings, unfiled late receipts, unitemized donor detail, ultimate sources behind intermediaries, and a full reconciliation between SOS adjusted totals and gross committee receipts remain unknown. Donor rankings aggregate captured receipts within a committee; they do not rank ultimate wealth owners. Loans are identified separately where available.

Corrections

No corrections logged. Spot an error? Tell us and we'll post the fix here.